![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
You know ...this would actually kind of ... work. "Ragdoll" for childhood. (Oh. Er ... OK, perhaps not for childhood. Maybe for the unfortunate things that happen before the next song.) "Janie's got a gun" for a really harsh adolescence. A medley of "Dream On" and "Pink" for a burgeoning realization; perhaps the first act close. "Livin on the Edge" for that first disillusioning trip to the Big City. "Crazy" and "Fallin' in Love (is hard on the knees)" as the great declarative love songs. "Fly Away from Here" for when harsh reality fought back. And, of course, the title song for the big second act close production number.
If it's true, that's just goddamn depressing.
Ha!
That's the question, you know. If this is actually true, how many people would still want to go?
This here comic is in reference to the artist's first sighting of this here building. Can't say I disagree all that much. " The design concept is based on the globe, broken into three fragments to depict the shattering effect of war on the history of the world. These three fragments, or "shards", are structurally interlocked to represent world conflict on land, water and in the air." ...All-righty, then!
THAT is worse than a pirate buggerer? Well, who knew? (...OK, almost everyone. But still.)
The Dark Knight is getting a certain amount of commentary about the violence inherent in the execution of this concept. Sometimes very odd comentary. (Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike this. Or possibly this, either. Or maybe even this. Or just maybe this. Or even this one. Or even this one. There's a whole lotta Dark Knight going on is what I'm saying.)
Somehow, I'm pretty sure that the even less PC meaning was what was being referenced. (See comment below strip.)
Hmm. Well, that was unexpected. As was this.
And in conclusion, first read this article from Newsweek. Then start here and read the next six strips. (For extra credit, you can also hit up the last item in Savage Love podcast 91.) Any questions?
If it's true, that's just goddamn depressing.
Ha!
That's the question, you know. If this is actually true, how many people would still want to go?
This here comic is in reference to the artist's first sighting of this here building. Can't say I disagree all that much. " The design concept is based on the globe, broken into three fragments to depict the shattering effect of war on the history of the world. These three fragments, or "shards", are structurally interlocked to represent world conflict on land, water and in the air." ...All-righty, then!
THAT is worse than a pirate buggerer? Well, who knew? (...OK, almost everyone. But still.)
The Dark Knight is getting a certain amount of commentary about the violence inherent in the execution of this concept. Sometimes very odd comentary. (Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike this. Or possibly this, either. Or maybe even this. Or just maybe this. Or even this one. Or even this one. There's a whole lotta Dark Knight going on is what I'm saying.)
Somehow, I'm pretty sure that the even less PC meaning was what was being referenced. (See comment below strip.)
Hmm. Well, that was unexpected. As was this.
And in conclusion, first read this article from Newsweek. Then start here and read the next six strips. (For extra credit, you can also hit up the last item in Savage Love podcast 91.) Any questions?
Tags: